Photoelectric effect, retarding potential

howin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Photoelectric effect, retarding potential

Homework Statement



If the photocurrent of a photocell is cut off by a retarding potential of 0.92 volts for monochromatic radiation of 2500 A (A with the little circle above it), what is the work function of the material.

Homework Equations



My book and professor use different symbols so I am going to define the symbols I am using:
Ø means retarding potential / stopping potential
W means work function

e Ø = hc/lambda - W

hc = 1240 eV

The Attempt at a Solution



radiance is invariant with lambda b/c monochromatic
According to the graph of photocurrent i vs. anode voltage V, it is when V = -Ø that i goes to 0. I don't see where 2500A fits in, except that that must give me lambda so that I can solve for W in the equation above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got everything you need. Just plug them all into your equation and solve for W!
 
2500 \AA is the wavelength.

1 \AA = 10^{-10}m
 
Wow, that helps a lot!

Oh okay, having A be a measure of length helps a lot...I was an econ/poli sci major so missed a lot of this stuff undergrad = )

2500A = 2.5 * 10^-7m = 250 nm

So W = (1240 eV nm / 250 nm) - .92 eV = 4.04 eV which is the work function.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top