Photons striking a metal target

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrusko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Photons
AI Thread Summary
Balmer-B photons from a hydrogen discharge lamp have an energy of 2.55 eV. The work functions for sodium, aluminum, and silver are 2.46 eV, 4.08 eV, and 4.73 eV, respectively. Sodium is the only metal that can emit photoelectrons since its work function is lower than the photon energy. The discussion clarifies that while a photon must transfer all its energy to an electron, it does not need to match the work function exactly; any excess energy contributes to the electron's kinetic energy. This understanding resolves the initial confusion regarding photon energy and work function requirements.
Andrusko
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sodium, aluminium and silver have work functions of 2.46, 4.08 and 4.73 eV respectively. Which, if any of these metals will emit photoelectrons when irradiated by Balmer-B photons from a hydrogen discharge lamp?


Homework Equations



Energy = 13.6(\frac{1}{n_{1}^{2}} - \frac{1}{n_{2}^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above formula I have calculated that Balmer-B photons from a hydrogen discharge lamp have an energy of 2.55 eV.

My answer is none though, because I was under the impression that a photon has to give up all or none of its energy in a collision like this. So wouldn't the work function have to exactly match the photon energy?

That doesn't really sound right, but I'm sure that there is a condition about photons giving up all or none of their energy in this photoelectric stuff. Can someone please clarify?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andrusko said:

Homework Statement



Sodium, aluminium and silver have work functions of 2.46, 4.08 and 4.73 eV respectively. Which, if any of these metals will emit photoelectrons when irradiated by Balmer-B photons from a hydrogen discharge lamp?


Homework Equations



Energy = 13.6(\frac{1}{n_{1}^{2}} - \frac{1}{n_{2}^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above formula I have calculated that Balmer-B photons from a hydrogen discharge lamp have an energy of 2.55 eV.

My answer is none though, because I was under the impression that a photon has to give up all or none of its energy in a collision like this. So wouldn't the work function have to exactly match the photon energy?

That doesn't really sound right, but I'm sure that there is a condition about photons giving up all or none of their energy in this photoelectric stuff. Can someone please clarify?
The photon must indeed 'give up all or none' of it's energy to the electrons, but this doesn't mean that the photon energy needs to be equal to the work function. The work function is the energy required for the electron to become 'unbound' from the surface of the metal, any additional energy imparted on the electron by a photon contributes to the kinetic energy of the electron.

Does that make sense?
 
Ah, of course! I see now. Thankyou very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top