Phys book on level of Halliday in style of Spivak

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a search for a physics textbook that combines the engaging presentation style of Feynman's lectures with the problem-solving depth found in Spivak's "Calculus," while maintaining the comprehensive nature of Halliday's 6th edition. The user finds Halliday's presentation uninspiring, despite its value as a reference. They express a desire for a book that emphasizes experimental results and first principles, guiding readers in deriving consequences rather than merely providing formulas. A recommendation is made for "The Feynman Lectures on Physics," which offers a more engaging approach and includes practice problems. The overall aim is to find a physics resource that balances clarity, depth, and mathematical significance.
sl.124
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to learn introductory physics for about a month now from a copy of Halliday 6th ed with some supplements from MITs 8.01 and an electronic copy of Feynman's lectures (I'm at about chapter/lecture 10 give or take in all of them) and I'm finding the presentation in Halliday rather uninspiring. It's a great reference book I think, but I find the presentation lacking.

This is contrasted with Feynman (but no corresponding problems) and Spivak's "Calculus", not a physics book, but I think it combines the presentation of Feynman with great problems that seem to have some mathematical significance. For example, I just finished deriving the Lagrangian interpolation formula, which is both an interesting question (given some points on a graph, what is a polynomial function that goes through all of them?) and one that seems to have some mathematical significance.

So basically what I'm looking for is physics book on the level of Halliday but that has the presentation of Feynman and the problems of Spivak (Spivak's presentation is as good as Feynman too).

Thanks
S.L.

(as an addendum: basically, is there a physics book that lays out experimental results/first principles and guides you in deriving its consequences? The rocket equations are an example of this, Halliday just kinda throws it at you and tells you to plug some numbers in...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would recommend "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" by Richard Feynman, Robert Leighton and Matthew Sands. This book is a classic for physics and contains a lot of the same topics as Halliday's textbook, but in a much more engaging and interesting way. It has problems throughout the text, so you can practice your understanding of the material as you go along. The book also provides some great insights into how to think about physics problems and concepts.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top