Physical Asymptote Homework: Trajectory y=x^4-x^2 & Limit y(x)=h

  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asymptote Physical
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


For example particle performs a motion in x-y plane. In y there are walls from both side so particle can go in y direction from zero to h. I need to plot trajectory. If I got trajectory y=x^4-x^2 then
\lim_{x\to \infty}y(x)=\infty[/B]<h2>Homework Equations</h2><h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2> <br /> If I got trajectory y=x^4-x^2 then<br /> \lim_{x\to \infty}y(x)=\infty, but because of the condition I may say that <b>\lim_{x\to \infty}y(x)=h. Maybe then y=h is some natural horisontal asymptote?</b>[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. It's hard to understand what your problem exactly is. Could you clarify it maybe by giving its original statement?
If you are asked to plot a two-dimensional trajectory parametrized by:
y = x4–x2,
Under the constraint: ymax= h,
Then it gives you a natural constraint on x as well, as a function of h; if you need to plot this you'll have to assign an arbitrary value to h so that you can plot something.
Now depending on this value, your plot will not always look the same but that's all you can do with the given information...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top