Physical interpretation of the rotation of a ket

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3
physical interpretation of the "rotation" of a ket

Homework Statement



No problem statement. I'm just having trouble imagining what it means to "rotate" a quantum -ket, especially since not all -kets are eigenstates of position. I know what the rotation operator is. I also can picture rotating a coordinate system in my head--that's easy of course. But what does it mean when a -ket is rotated?


Homework Equations



see attached .pdf. they are notes I've taken from shankar p. 306-306.

The Attempt at a Solution



see attached .pdf. they are notes I've taken from shankar p. 306-306.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org


Take the spin of an electron, for example. Suppose it's in the state
\vert \alpha \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}
which is the +-eigenstate of Sx. If you rotate it by 90 degrees about the z-axis, you'd expect it to be in the +-eigenstate of Sy. The rotation operator about the z-axis for spin-1/2 is
R(\phi)=\exp\left(-\frac{i S_z \phi}{\hbar}\right) = \begin{pmatrix}e^{-i\phi/2} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i\phi/2}\end{pmatrix}
For \phi=\pi/2, you get
\vert \alpha_R \rangle = R(\pi/2)\vert \alpha \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}e^{-i\pi/4} \\ e^{i\pi/4}\end{pmatrix} = \frac{e^{-i\pi/4}}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ i \end{pmatrix}
which is indeed the +-eigenstate of Sy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top