Physics: Efficiency of toy car going upwards on a slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the efficiency of a toy car powered by a spring as it moves up a slope. The user is struggling to determine the spring constant, questioning why it appears to change with different slope angles despite the formula for work done by the spring being correct. Responses clarify that the spring constant is inherently constant unless the spring is deformed beyond its elastic limit and suggest that the user may not be accounting for varying forces acting on the spring at different angles. The importance of integrating the force over the displacement is emphasized to understand the energy dynamics involved. Accurate measurement and consideration of the forces at play are crucial for resolving the user's confusion.
sciencerules
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
the toy car gains energy by pushin down the "head" of the "driver" and is powered by a spring that powers the wheels. at different heights, it has different spring constant. I mean the slope's angles are changed at different periods of the experiment. I am unable to work out the spring constant. isn't it supposed to be Work done by the spring = .5*spring constant*displacement^2?? for different angles, my spring constants are changing. any help in solving my mystery??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that can't be right. The spring constant is something inherent in the spring that will always stay constant, unless of course it is pushed beyond its elasticity limit. I think you must be measuring the spring constant wrong.

Remember that

Work = \int \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{l}

Are you accounting for different forces at different angles acting on the spring?

The equation you are using is correct because
\frac{-d U}{dx}=F=-kx
which when you carry the dx to the other side and integrate between 0 and length s you will find that
U(s)=U(0)+\frac{1}{2}ks^2
 
Thanx Mindscrape,
however, da force i put in was the same. we used da one toy car and pressed it down till it cld not go down any further. how do i account for da different forces at different angles?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top