• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Physics Midterm Question 3 Help

  • Thread starter Nimmy
  • Start date
  • #1
41
0
Ok, well I asked this question somewhere else and he said the same answer I wrote on my exam. But I got docked heavily for that. Ok well here's the problem:

A negative charge - Q is distributed uniformly over a half circle with radius 'R'. P is at the center of the half circle.

A) Show that the electric field at point 'p' is given by E = -(2kQ/πR2)j

Magnetic Flux = Integral of E dot da = Q enclosed/Epsilon knott
= E is uniform therefore it pops out of the integral and you get E integral of da = Qenclosed/Epsilon knott. Intergration of da is A. So it forms into E dot A = Qenclosed/Epsilon knott.

E = -Q/Epsilon knott x 2/Pi r^2
E= -2/Epsilon knott x Q/Pi r^2

What's Wrong with my process because I ONLY got 3/15 on this.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
diazona
Homework Helper
2,175
6
Is it half of a filled circle or half of a circular ring?

[tex]\iint \vec{E}\cdot\mathrm{d}\vec{a}[/tex] is electric flux, not magnetic flux

Why do you say [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] is uniform?

Also, for what it's worth, it's [tex]\epsilon_0[/tex], "epsilon-zero" or "epsilon-naught" by some (not "epsilon-knott")
 
  • #3
Doc Al
Mentor
44,882
1,129
Magnetic Flux = Integral of E dot da = Q enclosed/Epsilon knott
= E is uniform therefore it pops out of the integral and you get E integral of da = Qenclosed/Epsilon knott. Intergration of da is A. So it forms into E dot A = Qenclosed/Epsilon knott.
Are you trying to use Gauss's law? Over what surface? Why do you think the electric field is uniform? (That's electric flux--not magnetic flux--of course.)

The way to solve this is to by direct integration of the electric field due each element of charge around the half circle.
 
  • #4
41
0
Is it half of a filled circle or half of a circular ring?

[tex]\iint \vec{E}\cdot\mathrm{d}\vec{a}[/tex] is electric flux, not magnetic flux

Why do you say [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] is uniform?

Also, for what it's worth, it's [tex]\epsilon_0[/tex], "epsilon-zero" or "epsilon-naught" by some (not "epsilon-knott")
It's half of a circular ring. Sorry I meant Electric Flux. Magnetic Flux = Integral of B dot Da = mew-naught x Ienclosed. So you are saying the E Field is not uniform? Is it because its not an enclosed circle?
 
  • #5
Doc Al
Mentor
44,882
1,129
It's half of a circular ring. Sorry I meant Electric Flux. Magnetic Flux = Integral of B dot Da = mew-naught x Ienclosed. So you are saying the E Field is not uniform? Is it because its not an enclosed circle?
To apply Gauss's law you need a closed surface and enough symmetry to make the electric field uniform over that surface. Gauss's law won't help you solve this problem.
 
  • #6
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,098
129
So you are saying the E Field is not uniform? Is it because its not an enclosed circle?
E is not uniform because it is not a flat plate.

Re-read the last sentence in Doc Al's post #3.
 
  • #7
41
0
Are you trying to use Gauss's law? Over what surface? Why do you think the electric field is uniform? (That's electric flux--not magnetic flux--of course.)

The way to solve this is to by direct integration of the electric field due each element of charge around the half circle.
So Magnetic Flux = integral of E? Im confused about what formula to use on that question.
 
  • #8
Doc Al
Mentor
44,882
1,129
So Magnetic Flux = integral of E?
Forget about electric flux and Gauss's law.
Im confused about what formula to use on that question.
Think of the half circle as a bunch of small charge segments. What's the field from a point charge? Add them up! (Integrate.)
 
  • #9
41
0
Forget about electric flux and Gauss's law.

Think of the half circle as a bunch of small charge segments. What's the field from a point charge? Add them up! (Integrate.)
Integration of Kq/r^2?
 
  • #10
diazona
Homework Helper
2,175
6
Integration of Kq/r^2?
Yep...but you have to remember that the direction of the electric field coming from each little segment is different. So you can't just multiply Kq/r^2 by the length of the half-circle; you need to account for the different directions.
 
  • #11
Doc Al
Mentor
44,882
1,129
Integration of Kq/r^2?
Yes. Express the element of charge, dq, in terms of charge density and the element of length along the half circle. Note that the field is a vector; make use of symmetry to simplify the integral.
 
  • #12
41
0
Yes. Express the element of charge, dq, in terms of charge density and the element of length along the half circle. Note that the field is a vector; make use of symmetry to simplify the integral.
So lambda= Q/Pi R since the total Length is half the circumference of the circle is 1/2 (2pi R). dq = lambda dl
dq = Q/Pi R dl

E = integration of k dQ/R^2
E = k integration of Q/Pi R/ R^2

Is this right step so far?
 
  • #13
diazona
Homework Helper
2,175
6
If you mean
[tex]\mathrm{d}q = \frac{Q}{\pi R}\mathrm{d}l[/tex]
then yes, that is right. And if you mean
[tex]E = \int \frac{k\mathrm{d}q}{R^2} = k\int \frac{Q}{\pi R}\frac{1}{R^2}\mathrm{d}l[/tex]
that's almost right - but remember, you do need to account for the direction of the electric field.
 
  • #14
41
0
If you mean
[tex]\mathrm{d}q = \frac{Q}{\pi R}\mathrm{d}l[/tex]
then yes, that is right. And if you mean
[tex]E = \int \frac{k\mathrm{d}q}{R^2} = k\int \frac{Q}{\pi R}\frac{1}{R^2}\mathrm{d}l[/tex]
that's almost right - but remember, you do need to account for the direction of the electric field.
[tex]\frac{k}{\pi}\int \frac{-Q}{R^3}\mathrm{d}l[/tex] =

[tex]\frac{-k}{\pi R^2}\int {Q}\mathrm{d}l[/tex]

Where do I go from here?

Because its supposed to be

E = [tex]\frac{-2kQ}{\pi R^2} [/tex]
 
  • #15
Doc Al
Mentor
44,882
1,129
You need to take into account the direction of the electric field from each point. Hints: Consider horizontal and vertical components. Express the field in terms of an angle.

Rewrite your integral with that in mind.
 
  • #16
diazona
Homework Helper
2,175
6
Let me clarify my previous post:
[tex]E = \int \frac{k\mathrm{d}q}{R^2} = k\int \frac{Q}{\pi R}\frac{1}{R^2}\mathrm{d}l[/tex]
is wrong. It's very close to being right, but it's not actually correct.

As I said (and apparently, as Doc Al said while I was writing this), you need to account for the direction of the electric field. Now, the electric field from each little segment of charge points directly away from that segment. Hopefully you can see that at the center of the (half-)circle, the electric fields from all those little segments are pointing in different directions. For example, the field from the left end of the loop points to the right, and the field from the right end of the loop points to the left - those two will cancel out. The field from the segment directly above the center of the half-circle points straight down, but because it's a half-circle, there's no segment below the center to cancel that one out. And so on.

Mathematically, the way you take that into account is by inserting a unit vector into the integral:
[tex]E = k\int \frac{Q}{\pi R}\frac{(-\hat{r})}{R^2}\mathrm{d}l[/tex]
where [tex]-\hat{r}[/tex], for each small segment of the loop, is a vector of length 1 which points directly away from that segment. You can't pull [tex]\hat{r}[/tex] out of the integral because it's different for each segment - but you can express it in terms of other vectors, [tex]\hat{x}[/tex] and [tex]\hat{y}[/tex] (the unit vectors in the x and y directions), which are the same for all segments. Can you figure out how you'd do that? (It'll probably help to draw a picture)
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Physics Midterm Question 3 Help

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top