Physics of baseball at Coors Field, Denver

Thread starter Darkmisc
Start date Jun 15, 2010
Tags

Baseball Field Physics

AI Thread Summary

The thin air at Coors Field in Denver contributes to an increased likelihood of home runs due to reduced air resistance. While the initial velocity of the baseball remains constant, the ball decelerates more slowly in the thinner atmosphere, allowing it to travel farther. This phenomenon results in a noticeable difference in how far balls can be hit compared to venues at lower elevations. The impact of altitude on baseball physics is significant, making Coors Field a unique environment for hitters. Overall, the combination of altitude and air density plays a crucial role in the dynamics of baseball at this location.

Jun 15, 2010

Darkmisc

I've read that the thin air at Coors Field, Denver (among other factors) makes it a venue conducive to home runs.

As a percentage, how much faster does the ball travel due to the thinner air?

Physics news on Phys.org

Jun 15, 2010

russ_watters

Mentor

Insights Author

Faster? The ball starts off with almost exactly the same initial velocity - it just decelerates at a slower rate.

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

View full post »