Physics past paper question - hard disks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework question related to calculating the number of magnets per disk based on frequency and circumference. The user correctly calculates the frequency as 120 Hz and the circumference as 0.2796 m. The confusion arises from interpreting the dimensions of the magnets, specifically the length versus width, in relation to the disk's circumference. It is clarified that the length referred to in the problem corresponds to the length along the circumference, not the radial length. This distinction is crucial for accurately determining the number of magnets per disk.
jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I have attached the question

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



so the first thing I did was find the frequency = 120 Hz
The next thing I did was find the circumference = 0.2796 m (from pi*d)

Now I know that the answer is no. magnets per disk * 120
BUT I am told the LENGTH of a magnet not the width (I know exacly what I have to do - circumerence / length of magnet = no. magnet per disk) but I cannot see why this works (I have the MS so I know I had to do that)

Please could someone explain why this is the case

thanks
 

Attachments

  • HardDisk.png
    HardDisk.png
    33.5 KB · Views: 525
Physics news on Phys.org
well it seems to me actually this is the ONLY way to look at it...I will put the issue down to semantics.

never mind :)
 
The "length occupied by each separate magnetized region" is its length along the circumference of the circle that the head is reading.

I suspect that you were thinking of the length corresponding to the radial lengths of the magnets depicted in the diagram (since clearly they show the magnets being longer in the radial direction than the circumferential direction), so you were thinking that what you really needed was the widths of those magnets. In this case it may be that the given diagram has caused some confusion due to assumptions it led you to make on the geometry being described in the problem itself.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top