Physics problem, involving Hookes Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a mass and a spring, specifically applying Hooke's Law to determine how far the spring was compressed. The key equations used are the elastic potential energy (Ep) and kinetic energy (Ek) formulas. Participants debate the correct application of energy conservation principles, noting that at the equilibrium point (x=0), the potential energy is zero and only kinetic energy remains. One user arrives at a compression value of 0.358 m, suggesting possible discrepancies in the textbook answer or unaccounted friction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy conservation to solve for the spring's compression accurately.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


A 0.500 kg mass is resting to a horizontal spring constant of 45 N/m. Your lab partner pulls the spring back and releases it when you are not looking. When the spring reaches its equilibrium point (x=0) the velocity of the mass is 3.4 m/s.

Find how far your partner compressed the spring.


Homework Equations


Ep = 1/2 k x ^2
k = spring constant
Ek = 1/2 m v ^2



The Attempt at a Solution


Not really sure how to do this, since there is more than one unknown.

Ep1 = Ep2 + Ek2

They never stated the spring stops at x=0, and I'm willing to bet it doesn't. However, when I assume that Ep1 = Ek2 and assume it stops, I get 0.30 m (rounded) when the answer should be 0.19m

Am I doing this right if I just set Ep1 to Ek2? It doesn't make sense to do it like this, because it should be

Ep1 = Ep2 + Ek2

But then we don't have enough info to solve the equation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the elastic potential energy at the equilibrium point (x=0)?
Check the first sentence of your post. Something is missing. ehild
 
what you're really saying is that at x=0 the total energy of the system is just the KE because the spring is at its equilibrium position and hence there's zero PE and initially there's no KE and since energy is conserved.

PE1 + KE1 = PE2 + KE2 where KE1=0 and PE2=0 so PE1 = KE2 seems right.

I calculated the compression to be 0.358 m so I'm thinking maybe the book answer is wrong or there's some assumed friction component.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top