Physics with computer science versus Physics.

Click For Summary
A PhD in physics may not guarantee a desirable job, prompting interest in combining physics with computer science to enhance employment prospects in tech fields like networking and security. A double major in physics and computer science is seen as more advantageous for job opportunities compared to a pure physics degree. If a double major isn't feasible, taking additional computer science courses and engaging in relevant projects can still strengthen one's academic profile. Personal experiences highlight that a background in programming, even without a formal CS major, can lead to successful careers in both physics and computer science, emphasizing the importance of practical skills and adaptability in the job market.
HermitOfThebes
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I am definitely interested in physics, I love it and I love doing it, but I am afraid a PhD in physics might not be enough for me to a land a decent job, by decent I mean enjoyable for me. I am very fond of programming, I know computer science is not just programming but I love programming and I love problem solving so I thought maybe if I do physics and computer physics, I would more easily get a job in networking/security/tech design, would this be correct? is a physics with computer science degree more valuable than a pure physics degree when it comes to employment in the computer world? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Having a double major in physics and CS would probably give you more options than a plain physics major, if you can fit in all the courses for both. If you can't manage a double major, you can still take enough CS courses to make it strongly visible on your academic record, and do projects in connection with physics, or on your own.

I like programming a lot, too, but my undergraduate college didn't have a CS major 40 years ago, just a couple of courses in Fortran programming. I did a lot of programming on my own (both in Fortran and in assembly language on two different kinds of computers), and did my Ph.D. in experimental particle physics where I spent all my time programming. I ended up getting a teaching-oriented position at a small college where I taught both physics and intro CS courses for many years. If I hadn't gotten a teaching job, I probably would have become a programmer.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
575
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
810
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K