Piezo materials -- piezo cable under saddle pickup for accoustic guitars

AI Thread Summary
Piezo cables under saddle pickups for acoustic guitars convert sound into electrical signals, functioning similarly to microphones. The bendable nature of these cables raises concerns about whether bending them could generate unwanted electrical impulses. However, the piezo element is compressed under string tension, limiting its ability to bend significantly. It effectively captures vibrations from both string movements and external impacts, which can affect sound clarity. Overall, while piezo pickups are sensitive to various vibrations, their design mitigates excessive bending effects.
ryanuser
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Hey

My question relates to piezo cable under saddle pickup for accoustic guitars. They change the guitar's sound into electrical energy. They work almost like a microphone.
But these cables are bendable, would that mean bending them can cause an electrical impulse along Becasue they are up of piezo electric materials?

But if this is true, when a guitar player is playing, they hit the guitar, so the cable vibrates too; so wouldn't the impulses from sound and the vibration be picked up by the piezo cable, so the sound heard from the loud speaker is no longer clear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The cable is just regular wire (coaxial, at a guess).
The piezo element is sandwiched under the saddle and compressed by string tension so is not able to bend much at all.
fantawestern-2.jpg


But yes, the piezo element picks up physical motion of the sound board & saddle, whether it is from the strings vibration or from a direct beer bottle impact from a disgruntled spectator.
 
Best answer I ever received on PF. Short and clear.

Thanks
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top