Pioneer anomaly not gravitational

AI Thread Summary
The Pioneer anomaly refers to an unexpected sunward acceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft that exceeds predictions from Newtonian gravity, measured at (8.74 ± 1.33) × 10−10 m/s² between 10AU and 90AU from the Sun. The anomaly's constancy over such distances suggests it is not gravitational in nature, as gravitational forces would typically diminish with distance. A proposed explanation attributes this acceleration to non-uniform radiation from the spacecraft's onboard radioisotope energy source, which generates a force due to its asymmetrical shape. Recent research supports this thermal radiation model, indicating that the anomalous acceleration may decay exponentially over time. Overall, the evidence leans towards an onboard source rather than a gravitational anomaly.
Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
The Pioneer anomaly
I read that the Pioneer anomaly is a sunward acceleration that is larger than Newtonian gravity predicts.
This extra acceleration has been measured at;
(8.74 ± 1.33) × 10−10 m/s2 between 10AU and 90AU from the Sun.

But because the ‘extra acceleration’ is constant across about 80 AU of space, how can it be gravitational in nature?
If it was gravitational surely the value of the ‘extra acceleration’ would fall, the further away the Pioneer was.

At some point this ‘extra acceleration’ would swamp the Newtonian component.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Pioneer anomaly is essentially solved (IMHO). See this paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5222v1

The spacecraft contains an onboard radioistope energy source, so it is radiating energy to the environment. Because it is not a symmetrical object, it does not radiate uniformly in all directions. Since EM radiation carries momentum, the non-uniform radiation results in a force on the spacecraft . This force has been calculated quantitatively in the attached paper, and explains the observed acceleration of the spacecraft rather well.
 
Thanks phyzguy

That has put that question to rest for me.

The constant value of the anomaly across vast distances was more likely going to be due to an onboard source than gravity.

Although I think the paper still leaves a very small opening for alternative interpretations as they still undershot the value slightly.
 
For those interested, a new paper with additional data has improved the fit of the thermal radiation model, and shows that the anomalous acceleration appears to be decaying exponentially in time, as would be expected.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.2886v1
 
Back
Top