Pivoting Rod and Ball - Rotational Dynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational kinetic energy of a cylindrical rod and attached ball after the system pivots through 90 degrees. The moment of inertia is derived from the rod and ball's dimensions and masses, with formulas provided for both. The user is seeking to find the angular velocity (omega) to calculate kinetic energy using the equation KE=1/2Iω². There is confusion regarding how to determine omega, considering the effects of gravity during the rotation. The potential energy of the system at rest is also questioned, emphasizing the need to understand energy transformations in this dynamic scenario.
DelPopolo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cylindrical rod 26.0 cm long with a mass of 1.20 kg and a radius of 1.50 cm has a ball of diameter of 7.80 cm and a mass of 2.00 kg attached to one end. The arrangement is originally vertical and stationary, with the ball at the top. The apparatus is free to pivot about the bottom end of the rod.

(a) After it falls through 90°, what is its rotational kinetic energy?

Homework Equations


KE=1/2Iomega^2
I=(2mr^2)/5
I=(2mL^2)/3

The Attempt at a Solution



Moment of inertia=I of rod + I of ball?
I=(2*m*(r+L)^2)/5)+(2mL^2)/3
I'm lost as to finding \omega so I can find KE.

Please point me in the right direction.
Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Moment of Inertia of a rod about pivot is

I_r=\frac{mL^2}{3}

And if you take level of pivet as zero level,after rod falls through 90°,total potential energy will be zero

so we have

PE_{initial}=\frac{1}{2}I_{total}\omega^2
 
I=(2*m*(r+L)^2)/5)+(mL^2)/3
I=.0985

so

KE=1/2(.0985)\omega^2

I need to find omega so I can find kinetic E. Correct?

How does one find omega? Obviously gravity affects the speed but gravity isn't the same over the entire rotation so how does that work out?
 
Last edited:
What's the potential energy of this system,when it's at rest?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top