Plane Waves in TDSE: Group & Phase Velocity

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
We are asked to substitute a plane wave solution into the TDSE for V=0 and show that it satisfies the TDSE (this is straightforward). Does this mean the plane waves are only solutions to the TDSE if V=0, or do they have other significance?

Also we show that the group velocity = v (the particle velocity) and that the phase velocity =v/2. The calculations are straighforward but the interpretation is difficult. I can see why the group velocity (the effective speed of the wave packet and the speed at which information is propogated) = v, but I can't see why the phase velocity = v/2.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in general plane waves are only solutions of the Schrodinger equation in regions where the potential is constant. The further imposition of boundary conditions when the potential is a series of steps generally restricts these states further (unlike in the free space case where the potential is the same constant everywhere). You can understand this quite physically as follows. The plane waves are states of definite momenta, but you know that in the presence of a non-constant potential, the momentum will change, therefore these states can't have definite energy (they can't be energy eigenstates) when the potential varies with position.

The point about the phase velocity versus group velocity bit is simply that the group velocity is what corresponds most directly with what you are familiar with from classical mechanics.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top