Plank and two supports using torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter coldsteel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving torque and forces acting on a uniform plank supported at two points, with a man standing on it. The problem requires determining the forces exerted by the supports and exploring the effects of changing the man's mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up equations based on torque and forces, considering different pivot points and the center of mass of the plank. Some participants question the placement of the pivot point and the distances used in the torque calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided guidance on setting up the equations correctly and checking the calculations. There is acknowledgment of the need to sum moments about different points to verify results. The discussion is ongoing regarding the implications of changing the man's mass on the forces exerted by the supports.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring the system is in equilibrium, and participants are examining the assumptions made regarding distances and forces. The original poster's equations and reasoning are being scrutinized for accuracy.

coldsteel
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A man with a mass of 100kg is standing on a uniform plank of mass 50kg. The man is standing directly above the right support and the left support is located at the left end of the plank. The right support is 2m from the right end. the plank is 60m long. What is the magnitude of force the left support applies to the plank, the magnitude of force the right support applies, and if the man's mass was doubled the force by the left support would remain the same, increase or decreas?
Equations: Tnet=0
Fnet=0

I tried solving the force by the left support...I set the pivot point on the right support. I got the distance of the man from the pivot point is 0. the beam is 6m long so the center mass is mg(1/2* 6) my equation is tnet=0 I get 100(9.8)(0m)+50(9.8)(3m)-Force left(4m)=0. I know this isn't right but can someone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight resultant force acts at the cg of the plank, which is not 3 m from the right support.
 
the 3m is half the length of the board. so should I move my pivot point to the far left support? so the center mass of the plank would be 3m? This is the equation I get: 50(9.8)(3m)-Force left(0m)+100(9.8)(4m)=0 there's nothing to solve with that though
 
Last edited:
Ahhhh...after struggling for 2 hours and wearing down my eraser...I think I may have solved this. take a look at what I did and let me know if its finally right.

these are the equations I used. I had 2 unknown so I set the pivot point on the left support to =0.
1.) 50kg(9.8)(3m)+100(9.8)(4m) - Force right support(4m) = 0 solve this to get Fr=1347.5N.

2.) now that I have the force the right support gives I can use it in the equation fnet=0 to solve for the left support force. FL+FR-mplank(g) - mman(g)=0
FL+1347.5 - 490 - 980 = 0. solve for FL to get 122.5N

Correct?
 
Yes, for a system in equilibrium, you can sum moments about any point=0, and use also F_net =0, to get the result, which you did.
If you summed moments about the right support, you get the same answer , but you mistakenly took the lever arm of the weight force as 3 m when you tried it that way, when you should have used 1 m as that distance. Then , summing moments about the right support, your equation should have read

100(9.8)(0 m)+50(9.8)(1 m [/color]) - Force_left(4 m)=0, from which
Force_left = 122.5 N, same result. It is always a good idea, however, to sum moments = 0 about both supports independently, and use F_net = 0, to check your work to be sure you didn't make a math or other error.

Now you should answer the last question, if you so choose, "...if the man's mass was doubled the force by the left support would remain the same, increase or decrease"?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K