Playing with Small Natural Numbers Network

networks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Since my late interests have been related to networks, I've started a pet project focusing on natural numbers network. I wanted to share my early explorations with this community since you have the proper background to interpret the results. I chose this network exactly because compared to real-world networks that are in my focus during the daytime, numbers network has been analysed for centuries and I hope that new ideas will emerge from this interaction. I acknowledge that for given topic, using number theory would be more appropriate, but hopefully you will find something interesting in the results. Please note that I do not have background in number theory.

Since the report is rather long and includes diagrams, I'm posting a link to my blogpost. You can expect to find there analysis of the common properties of networks.
http://www.ideavoid.com/blog/2010/10/playing-with-small-natural-num.html

Looking forward for your feedback.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Networks,

Can I take it that you are familiar with the work of Barabasi as well as Strogatz and Watts? While I might be the wrong guy to give you the manner of feedback you are looking for, if only because I have similar interests as you and also have no formal number theory training, what I can tell you is that there are others out there thinking in similar manner as you are. By way of example, the long term project I am working on?

"Organic Symmetry: Explorations in Linking Lattices and Matrices to the Unification of Social & Physical Spaces"
(title provisional)

I'll try to take a closer look at your report at some point in the near future.RaphieSome suggested general reading if you haven't already read these books:

Consilience - E.O Wilson
Nexus - Mark Buchanan
Critical Mass - Philip Ball
Linked - Albert Laszlo Barabasi
The Music of the Primes - Marcus du Sautoy
Why Beauty Is Truth: A History of Symmetry- Ian Stewart

Also...

Gut Feelings - Gerd Gigerenzer
The Singularity is Near - Ray Kurzweil
Here Comes Everybody - Clay Shirky
 
Last edited:
Thanks Raphie, I've read only some of the general reading you suggested. Looking forward for your feedback - my daily work is related to global social networks.

CRG, as for your comment on the choice of the generated network in mymathforum - since it was based on intuition, I'll need to take a moment to revisit that part.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top