Please help; Explain phenomena about collision and water.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the physics of collisions involving water, particularly in a ball. It highlights how the behavior of water changes during successive bounces, with the second bounce not allowing the water to rebound as effectively as the first. The concepts of momentum and energy transfer are mentioned, specifically referencing the equations for conservation of momentum. The interaction between the ball and water affects the height of the bounce due to the timing of the water's movement. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on the principles governing these phenomena.
YOOKUNG
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Please help; Explain phenomena about collision and water.
click Now>>>>http://vimeo.com/29207632


thank you...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you have a specific question about this?
 
About motion of collision and water in ball // why object show that ? I not sure about momentum and energy ,i would like more explain.
 
Last edited:
On the 2nd bounce the water in the ball doesn't get a chance to "bounce" like it did the first time, so it comes crashing down after the ball is already in the air, keeping it from bouncing as high.
 
I explain from Pi = Pf or (m+M)u =(m+M)v, ? not sure
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

On the non-applicability of Newtonian mechanics
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Understanding Physics for Coding Collision of 2 Balls
Replies
14
Views
3K
What happened to the boiling water
Replies
13
Views
3K
Pressure in Gases: Boiling Water in a Can Explained
Replies
3
Views
2K
I How do we analyze collisions involving accelerating objects?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Collision in moving water-angle of rebound
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Work Done/Energy Transferred in One Dimensional Collision
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Air Gun Sighted at a Falling Target Demonstration
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is average time between and after collision same for a gas?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Momentum, Energy, and Elastic Collisions
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top