Please help Problems on particle-in-a-box models

  • Thread starter Thread starter wee00x
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Models
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of finding a particle in a 1D box between x = L/4 and x = L/2, given the normalized wave function for a particle in a box. The probability is determined using the formula P(particle between a and b) = ∫_a^b |ψ(x)|^2 dx, where the wave function ψ(x) is provided. Participants express confusion about how to apply the indefinite integral of sin^2(ax) and whether L will cancel out in the calculations. One user requests a complete calculation to identify where the misunderstanding lies. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the integral to derive a usable probability value.
wee00x
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The normalized wave function for a particle in a 1D box in which the potential energy is zero
between x= 0 and x= L and infinite anywhere else is

normalized wave function = sqrt(2/L)*sin(npix/L)

What is the probability that the particle will be found between x= L/4 and x= L/2 if the particle is in the state characterized by the quantum number n= 1?




Hint given:

indefinite integral of sin^2(ax)dx = .5x - .25asin(2ax)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you probably don't know (but should know) is that
P(particle between a and b)=∫_a^b |ψ(x)|^2 dx
where ψ is the wavefunction of the particle.
 
I am confused as to what I use the second formula for... How do I find the probability of the particle being located in the region bounded by x=l/4 and x=l/2? How do i get an actual value for this since L is being used, and not a real number?
 
How about you do the calculation and see what you end up with? There is a possibility that L cancels out...
Btw.: Which one is the second formula for you?
 
indefinite integral of sin^2(ax)dx = .5x - .25asin(2ax)

that is the second formula. and I tried working it out but I couldn't get L to cancel out.. i just got an ugly answer...
 
Please write down your entire calculation then I can help you with it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top