How Long to Travel from Venus to the Sun at Light Speed on May 17, 2006?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jay_Z_100
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Traveling from Venus to the Sun at the speed of light, which is approximately 299,792 km per second, would take about 600 seconds, given the distance of 108.2 million km. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding basic kinematics and encourages the original poster to attempt solving the problem independently. It also notes that while the distance is an approximation, the actual distance varies due to Venus's elliptical orbit. The conversation touches on the terminology of orbital mechanics, clarifying that terms like aphelion and perihelion are relevant for celestial bodies in relation to the Sun. Overall, the focus is on applying scientific principles to arrive at an approximate answer.
jay_Z_100
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I really need to know the answer so any help will be appreciated.

Q:- How many minutes would it take to travel from Venus to the Sun on 17th of May 2006 with the speed of light in Vacuum?

I know it's really hard but any help will be appretiated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello,
I may help you with your question.The speed of light in vacuum is 299792.458km per second and the distance between venus and sun is 108.2 million km
From milind shyani(india)
Milind_shyani1991@yahoo.co.in
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Milind: Thanks for helping, but we ask that you don't offer complete solutions. I've edited your post so that there is something left for jay_Z_100 to do.

jay_Z_100: You have to show some attempt at answering your own question. The problem is really not difficult at all. It is just simple kinematics, along with a little digging around for the distance between Venus and the Sun and for the speed of light. Milind did the digging for you, but there is no reason you cannot do it yourself.

Try to finish the problem using a basic formula of kinematics.
 
Tom Mattson said:
Milind: Thanks for helping, but we ask that you don't offer complete solutions. I've edited your post so that there is something left for jay_Z_100 to do.
jay_Z_100: You have to show some attempt at answering your own question. The problem is really not difficult at all. It is just simple kinematics, along with a little digging around for the distance between Venus and the Sun and for the speed of light. Milind did the digging for you, but there is no reason you cannot do it yourself.
Try to finish the problem using a basic formula of kinematics.
Either way, the answers wouldn't be correct, just approximate. For actual numbers, you would need an ephemeris generator or one by date since Venus's, and every other, orbit is elliptical with a perihelion and aphelion.
 
But will the approximation of distance be 108.2 million km as of May 17th 2006?

The OP must find the ecentricity of Venus's orbit and wether it will be closer to apogee or perigee.

Oldly enough, the question is worded "from Venus to the Sun" and not the other way around, because it may be too simple to where the student could google the answer, but does the wording of the question make any difference with reference to traveling at the speed of light?
 
Plastic Photon said:
But will the approximation of distance be 108.2 million km as of May 17th 2006?
Venus' aphelion is May 16-2006, Central time, might be May 17th GMT.
Plastic Photon said:
The OP must find the ecentricity of Venus's orbit and wether it will be closer to apogee or perigee.?
Venus has no apogee or perigee. "Gee" refers to Geos = Earth. For the Sun, it is perihelion and aphelion. For other stars, the terms are periastron and apastron.
Plastic Photon said:
Oldly enough, the question is worded "from Venus to the Sun" and not the other way around, because it may be too simple to where the student could google the answer, but does the wording of the question make any difference with reference to traveling at the speed of light?
No.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top