- #1
greisen
- 76
- 0
The problem is going from the Poisson-Boltzmann equation
[tex]\nabla (e(r)*\nabla \phi(r)) - \kappa^2(kT/q)*sinh(q*\phi(r)/kT) = -4*\pi \rho(r)[/tex]
The equation is than rewritten in terms of a reduced potential u
[tex]\nabla (e(r)*\nabla u(r)) - \kappa^2 sinh(u(r)) = -4\pi*\rho(r)[/tex]
The reduced potential is defined as [tex]u(r) = q*\phi / (kT)[/tex] - I can see that term q/kT is multiplied on the right side but nothing changes on the left side?
Have I totally misunderstood the equation and the approximation of the PBE?
Any help or advice appreciated. Thanks in advance.
best regards
[tex]\nabla (e(r)*\nabla \phi(r)) - \kappa^2(kT/q)*sinh(q*\phi(r)/kT) = -4*\pi \rho(r)[/tex]
The equation is than rewritten in terms of a reduced potential u
[tex]\nabla (e(r)*\nabla u(r)) - \kappa^2 sinh(u(r)) = -4\pi*\rho(r)[/tex]
The reduced potential is defined as [tex]u(r) = q*\phi / (kT)[/tex] - I can see that term q/kT is multiplied on the right side but nothing changes on the left side?
Have I totally misunderstood the equation and the approximation of the PBE?
Any help or advice appreciated. Thanks in advance.
best regards
Last edited by a moderator: