Polar Coordinates: Show Acceleration Angle of 30°

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the resultant acceleration of a particle described by the polar equation r = a e^{\theta \sqrt{3}} \cosh 2\theta, which rotates with a uniform angular speed ω. Participants explore using polar unit vectors to express the position, velocity, and acceleration vectors in terms of θ. They confirm that the acceleration formula is correct and note that the angular acceleration, \ddot{\theta}, is zero in this scenario. To demonstrate that the acceleration makes a 30-degree angle with the radius vector, they suggest computing the dot product of the acceleration and radius vector in two different ways and equating the results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper differentiation and vector analysis in solving the problem.
devious_
Messages
312
Reaction score
3
A particle P describes the curve with polar equation r = a e^{\theta \sqrt{3}} \cosh 2\theta in such a manner that the radius vector from the origin rotates with uniform angular speed \omega. Show that the resultant acceleration of the particle at any instant makes an angle of 30 degrees in the radius vector.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the polar unit vectors:

\hat{\mathbf{r}} = \cos \theta \hat{\mathbf{i}} + \sin \theta \hat{\mathbf{j}} \ \ \ \ \ \hat{\mathbf{\theta}} = -\sin \theta \hat{\mathbf{i}} + \cos \theta \hat{\mathbf{j}}

The nice thing about these is that you can start out with the position vector

\mathbf{r} = r \hat{\mathbf{r}}

and take derivatives of it to find the velocity and acceleration vectors. You are given r as a function of theta, and \dot{\theta} = \omega, so this should allow you to express all vectors in terms of theta.
 
I'm still not getting anywhere. Can you please show me the first couple of steps?
 
Right. I've tried some more and here's where I ended up:

\text{acceleration} = \langle \ddot{r} - r \dot{\theta ^2}, 2\dot{r}\dot{\theta} + r\ddot{\theta} \rangle

Now I've got to differentiate my expression for r and use the fact that \dot{\theta} = \omega.

Is that correct, or is there a better method?
 
devious_ said:
Right. I've tried some more and here's where I ended up:

\text{acceleration} = \langle \ddot{r} - r \dot{\theta ^2}, 2\dot{r}\dot{\theta} + r\ddot{\theta} \rangle

Now I've got to differentiate my expression for r and use the fact that \dot{\theta} = \omega.

Is that correct, or is there a better method?

Looks good so far. Don't forget that \ddot{\theta} = 0 in this problem
 
I've obtained an expression for the magnitude of the acceleration; how do I show that the particle makes an angle 30 at the radius vector?
 
compute dot product of acceleration and the radius vector two different ways, and set them equal.
 
Thanks :smile:
 
Back
Top