Polarization between 3 sheets intensity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the intensity of light passing through three polarizing sheets. The user initially calculates the intensity using the angle of 45 degrees between the sheets but arrives at an incorrect final answer of I_0/4 instead of the expected I_0/8. Clarification is provided that the initial intensity I_0 should be considered as the intensity after the first polarizer, which is typically I_0/2 for unpolarized light. The user realizes that the average electric field direction is indeed at 45 degrees relative to the transmission axis, affecting the calculations. Overall, the key issue is understanding how to apply Malus's Law correctly in this multi-sheet scenario.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Hi guys I am having a problem with this question
upload_2017-5-23_20-58-43.png

Q55 a) and b)

My problem is that for part a) I used the following logic. That if two sheet won't let light through at ##90^\circ## so if a 3rd sheet is inserted between the two the angle between each is ##45^\circ##, But for part a) ans b)seem to be getting something wrong. I assume the the light I will show my working below.

Homework Equations


##I=I_0cos^2\theta##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
a) light from sheet 1 to sheet 2 is:

##I_{1,2}=I_0(cos45)^2=\frac{I_0}{2}##

light from sheet 2 to sheet 3 is:

##I_{2,3}=\frac{I_0}{2}(cos45)^2=\frac{I_0}{4}##

but the ans is \frac{I_0}{8}

which is where I am confused is the first sheet be put at and angle of 45 degrees when light enters beacuse I was under the assumption the the first sheet is perpendicular to the last sheet at it is the sheet in the middle that is only 45 degrees.

I am having the same issue with b) thus why I have no workings
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ##I_o## in the law of Malus is usually taken to be the light intensity after the first polarizer. You need to first find out how that ##I_o## relates to the initial incident unpolarized light intensity :wink:
 
Ah yes I see now, that on average the electric field is 45 degree w/r to the trasmission axis. So the through the firs filter it would be ##I=I_0\frac{1}{2}##

thank you very much for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top