Does light intensity change with two polarizing sheets?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effect of two polarizing sheets on unpolarized light. After the first polarizing sheet, the intensity of the light is reduced to half of the original intensity, Io/2. After passing through the second sheet, which is oriented at 90 degrees to the first, the intensity becomes zero, as the cosine of 90 degrees is zero. It is clarified that one polarizing sheet does reduce the intensity of light, contrary to the initial assumption that it would have no effect. Overall, two perpendicular polarizers effectively block all light from passing through.
jdroidxw
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Unpolarized light of intensity Io is incident on two polarizing sheets whose axes are perpendicular.
A) what is the intensity of the light after the first sheet?
B) what is the intensity of the light after the second sheet?

Homework Equations



I=(Imax)cos^2(Θ)

The Attempt at a Solution



A) I thought the intensity would not change since you need two polarizing sheets at certain angles to change the intensity.

B) Intensity is 0? If I plug 90° into the relevant equation, I=0 since cosine at 90 degrees is zero.

Would I be correct in my steps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, two linear polarizers tilted at 90 degrees relative to each other will absolutely (or nearly absolutely) block all light from reaching the observer at the other end.
 
Okay thank you! And what about the one sheet? Would I be correct in saying that it would not have any effect regardless of the angle?
 
There would be some reduction in intensity with one polarizer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top