Polarization: ratio of transmitted to incident intensity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of transmitted intensity to incident intensity for unpolarized light passing through three polarizers at specified angles. Using Malus' law, the total angle of the transmission axes is determined to be 71°. The intensity ratio after passing through the polarizers is calculated as S/S0 = cos²(71°), resulting in a value of 0.11. The conversation also emphasizes the need to analyze the intensity after each polarizer individually. The final ratio indicates significant attenuation of the light intensity due to the polarizers' orientations.
aChordate
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam of unpolarized light is incident on a series of three polarizers as shown. The angle of the transmission axis of each polarizer is indicated by the dashed line, with q1 = 110, q2 =230, and q3 = 370 (all defined relative to vertical). What is the ratio of the transmitted intensity to the incident intensity?


Homework Equations



Malus' law S=S0cos2θ

The Attempt at a Solution



S/S0=cos2θ

θ=11°+23°+37°=71°

S/S0=cos2(71)=0.11
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After passing thru the first polarizer, what is the angle and intensity? Then, after passing thru the second polarizer, what is the angle and intensity? Finally, after passing thru the third polarizer, what is the angle and intensity?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top