How Much Light Passes Through Three Polarizing Sheets?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the fraction of intensity transmitted through three polarizing sheets, with the first and third sheets crossed and the second at 31 degrees to the first. The user correctly identifies the equations needed for the calculation, starting with unpolarized light passing through the first filter, resulting in I1 = 1/2 I0. The confusion arises regarding the angle for the third filter, which is determined to be 59 degrees, leading to the final equation I3 = (1/2) I0 cos²(31) cos²(59). The user expresses frustration over the angle interpretation but ultimately clarifies the relationships between the filters. The thread concludes with the user seeking confirmation on their approach to the problem.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I don't understand this question I guess, because I am not getting the right answer (the internet-site is not accepting it).

Question)
Three polarizing sheets are stacked. The first and third are crossed; the one between has its polarizing direction at 31.0(deg) to the polarizing direction of the other two. What fraction of the intensity of an originally unpolarized beam is transmitted by the stack?

My Work)
First the equations that will be used:
I = \frac{1}{2}I_0
I=I_0 \cos^2 \theta

So unpolarized light comes in through the first filter.
Lets label the light coming out as I_1

I_1 = \frac{1}{2}I_0

Next I_1 is polarized and travels through filter two. This filter is at an angle of 31(deg) to filter one. Thus,

I_2 = I_1 \cos^2 (31)

Next I_2 is polarized and travels trhough filter three. This filter is at an angle of ?. I think this is where I'm making the mistake. So the question says that filter two has an angle of 31 degrees to filter-one and filter-two. I'll just call this angle \alpha for now, since everything I've tried is not working :(

So,
I_3 = I_2 \cos^2 \alpha

Now combining the equations yields:
I_3 = \frac{1}{2}I_0 \cos^2(31) \cos^2(\alpha)

Now it wants a fraction so,
fra=\frac{I_3}{I_0}=\frac{1}{2} \cos^2(31) \cos^2(\alpha)


Am I doing this correctly? What about that pesky angle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the question says, "The first and third are crossed"

that means when the polarizing direction of filter-one is orthogonal to filter-two.

I just thought they couldn't be parallel. :(

grr... that was annoying.

so the angle turned out to be \alpha = 59 (deg)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top