Polarized Slab between Parallel Plate Electrode

Gandhi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the electric field everywhere for the following permanently polarized structures which do not support any free charge:
(b) Permanently polarized slab P_0 i_x of thickness b placed between parallel plate electrodes in free space at potential difference V_0



Homework Equations


D = ε_0 E + P
D = εE


The Attempt at a Solution


E_0(s-b) + E_i b = V_0 where E_0 is the electric field outside the slab and E_i is the electric field inside the slab.
εE_i = ε_0E_0 + P_0
From here I was thinking, since I have a coupled equation, I would solve for E_i and E_0 but I don't know if the above method will work since the value of ε was not given.
Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • hw.jpg
    hw.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 445
Physics news on Phys.org
When they say the polarization is permanent - do they mean that it does not depend on the applied field?
 
Simon Bridge said:
When they say the polarization is permanent - do they mean that it does not depend on the applied field?
It does not specify but I believe that is the case.
 
So what does that tell you about ##\epsilon##?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top