- #36
Cyrus
- 3,238
- 16
Ewwwww...that chicken is terrible! There is nothing creative about a big chicken.
Evo said:Actully the blue thing "represents" a dance, the title of the sculpture is "shim, sham, shimmy", it's not by Pollock, it's by some guy in Texas.
Cyrus said:Ewwwww...that chicken is terrible! There is nothing creative about a big chicken.
Evo said:I'm with fi, the chicken rules!
rewebster said:It's not that I don't like or appreciate Pollack's works, it's that I like other works more. A lot of 'jokes' were made about Pollack's work, as there has been about a lot of other 'art' that has been made and/or exhibited.
Do I have anything like Pollack's work hanging in my house?--no. Would I put the chicken, or the cactus in my yard? Well, I put the cactus in first about 100 times over the chicken, but that's from many, many years of dealing in one way or another with art, and I have a different appreciation for art that some others may have.
Evo said:I'm with fi, the chicken rules!
rewebster said:Roosters rule!
I look forward to it, hope you feel better.rewebster said:I'm going to start a thread (one of these days) about "ART"----sometime, after I get rid of these aches and have a clear head (a clear head in a couple of aspects)
That's beautiful.rewebster said:
Picasso rooster (not chicken)
Evo said:These make me feel like I am looking into a diseased mind. Dark, oppressive, angry, inability to separate their thoughts into meaning, it's a jumble of fragments of thought, failing to deliver a coherent thought.
The Kandinsky seems to show more control of his thoughts. The term I'd use for Pollock's paintings would be "schizophrenic art".