Possible to make smoke without the heat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kalle Eriksson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    heat smoke works
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of pyrotechnics and the challenges associated with their heat production and safety. A newcomer seeks to understand if it is possible to create effects similar to fireworks that do not generate extreme heat or last as long. Participants clarify the distinction between flame and smoke, suggesting alternatives like fog machines or smoke grenades, which may still produce some heat. The conversation emphasizes the inherent dangers of traditional pyrotechnics and explores the feasibility of safer, lower-heat alternatives for visual effects.
Kalle Eriksson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'm new here at Physics Forums and have been struggling with understanding how a simple
pyrotechnics works, and thought I'd try you guys.

As i understand pyrotechnics heat up, making them very hard to control and dangerous to people around them but is the extreme heat really necessary?

Is it possible to create something that looks like pyrotechnics but does not last as long and does not come near the heat?

Thank you and please excuse my ignorance
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You mean flame without heat?
 
Alcathous said:
You mean flame without heat?
I guess you could call it flame, i mean a "firework" like the one in this video;
And then the smoke like the one in this video;
 
Flame and smoke are completely different things. I would think you'd be familiar with something like a fog machine or smoke grenades(though they probably heat up, I just don't know how much), so I assumed you meant something else.

And then you mentioned pyrotechnics.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top