Potential Energy Homework: Solving F(r) = -k(r-a)

oldspice1212
Messages
149
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The net force on the mass is the central force F(r) = -k(r-a). Find the potential energy U(r).
a is the spring of natural length and k is spring constant k.

Homework Equations


-dU/dx = F(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


F(r) = - \frac{ dU }{ dr } implies -k(r-a) = - \frac{ dU }{ dr }
So I did this and then integrating both sides I got
\frac{ kr^2 }{ 2} - kar = U(r) but this doesn't make much sense when I graph it out, as it gives me a parabola, and I would be expecting a asymptotic type function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well think about what happens when r > a and r < a. Both states have potential energy and would therefore be parabolic with the vertex at r = a

P. S. I can't see your pics because I'm on my phone
 
  • Like
Likes oldspice1212
I didn't upload any pics, was just making sure, and yes that makes sense, thank you :)
 
  • Like
Likes Brian T
oldspice1212 said:
I didn't upload any pics, was just making sure, and yes that makes sense, thank you :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes oldspice1212
Yes, that's must easier to see! Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top