Power consumption in a rotating system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the power consumption of a rotating system involving multiple wheels powered by an e-motor and magnets. The user seeks to understand how much additional power is required to maintain the same rotation speed for additional wheels placed alongside the first. Concerns are raised about the effects of eddy currents, which could introduce energy costs similar to friction, potentially complicating the system's efficiency. The user proposes a design where each wheel has magnets aligned to induce current through coils, questioning if this could result in a net gain of energy. The conversation invites further ideas and insights on optimizing this system while adhering to the laws of physics.
GiZeHy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

i have a specific question concerning power consumption in a rotating system and hope that somebody out there can help me out.

Lets say we have a wheel, powered by an e-motor, that is surrounded by magnets that are attached to the edge of the wheel ( like a cog wheel but magnets instead of the cogs ). Now i place an identical wheel aside so that it is brought to movement by the first one (by the magnets). My question is: How much more power do i have to put into the e-motor that is making the first wheel spin, to make a second, third and so on.. wheel spin at the same rotation speed, that are aside the first one? Is there any other power stopping the additional wheels instead of the friction of air and the attachment? Important: i mean the additional power that is consumed when the system is already running!

Any help would be really nice ;)
ty
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
GiZeHy said:
[...] like a cog wheel but magnets instead of the cogs [...]

[...] Is there any other power stopping the additional wheels instead of the friction of air and the attachment? Important: i mean the additional power that is consumed when the system is already running!

I gather you are describing a system with frictionless cogs. Will such a setup with magnets act as frictionless cogs?

I suspect not. I suspect that eddy currents will be generated. The energy cost of the eddy currents acts in the same way as energy cost from friction. In fact, generating eddy currents is sometimes used as the basis of a braking system design.
 
my idea is to build a system in which you align many of these wheels but only one is powered by the motor. in addition i want to attach to each wheel a parallel one on which there are magnets attached to the edge but with the poles directed to the spinning direction. these should move through many aligned coils so that a current is induced over each wheel. now, if the additional power that is used to make the additional (magnet instead cog) wheels spin, is very low, maybe i can induce more current over the coils on each parallel wheel than necessary for powering the e-motor?!? it is an open system so nothing would offense the laws of physics for creating a higher output.

please bombard me with ideas ;)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top