Power Dissipation in Driven Oscillator: Calculate Average

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average power dissipated by the damping force in a driven oscillator, specifically showing that the average power is \overline{P} = -\frac{1}{2} b\omega^2 A^2. Participants clarify the relationship between displacement and velocity, emphasizing that the velocity v_x is the time derivative of the displacement x(t). The correct expression for velocity is derived using real functions, with x(t) = A cos(ωt) leading to v(t) = -ωA sin(ωt). The conversation highlights the importance of using real quantities in the calculations rather than complex representations. The thread concludes with a clear understanding of how to approach the integral for average power dissipation.
swuster
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The instantaneous power dissipated by the damping force in a driven oscillator is P(t) = f_x v_x = -bv_x ^2.
Show that the average power dissipated during one cycle of steady-state motion is \overline{P} = -\frac{1}{2} b\omega^2 A^2, where \omega is the driving frequency and A = |\underline{A}| is the oscillation amplitude.

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm attempting to just solve an integral for the average power:

\omega/2\pi*\int^{2\pi/\omega}_{0} -bv_x^2 dt

But what is v_x? If x(t) = \underline{A} e^{i \omega t}, then v(t) = i \omega \underline{A} e^{i \omega t} = i\omega x(t). So then I think that v_x = i\omega but this doesn't give me the correct answer when put into the integral. Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the real solution,

x(t) = \underline{A} cos(\omega t) or \underline{A} sin(\omega t).

The world is real, the displacement or velocity of a vibrating body is a real quantity. The complex formalism is just a tool to make solutions easier. It works for linear relations only.

ehild
 
So then if I just use x(t) = A cos(\omega t), then it follows that v(t) = -\omega A sin(\omega t). Is v_x just dv/dt / dx/dt then? That would make it \omega cot(\omega t) which also does not work in the integral
 
Last edited:
I do not understand what you are doing. v_x is the same as your v(t). The subscribe "x" means the x component of the velocity, and it is the time derivative of the x component of the displacement, x(t). That is, v_x = dx/dt .

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top