Power Plant Efficiency & Heat Dissipation Calculations

Martinii
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Power plant

Hi! Here i have a problem : A power plant generates 400 MW of electric power.It has an effieciency of 40%.
a) At what rate does it dissipate heat?
b)If the waste heat is carried away by a river, and the temperature rise of the river must not exceed 3°C, what flow rate is required in the river?


Here is what i have tried:

a)
Pel=400 MW
η=40%=0.4
Pth=Pel/η=1000 MW

b) Pwaste=W/t Q=W=m*c*ΔT m=ρ*V

Pwaste=(ρ*V*c*ΔT)/t V/t= Volume Flow = V°= Pwaste/(ρ*c*ΔT)

Pwaste= Pth-Pel=600 MW and then calculations

I am not quite sure whether this way is correct or not.I will be happy if someone can tell me his opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems right to me, although there is at least one assumpution which is implied:
1. All of the wasted energy is lost as heat.
Fairly reasonable, there's bound to be some light and sound etc. but the vast majority will definitely be heat.

I don't fully understand your notation for Pwaste, but it looks pretty good. I guess one assumes that the river isn't below 0 C, and you can look up the specific heat of water, so that's no biggy. Seems like you got it.
 
Yeah , i think i got it! Thanks anyway :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top