Power Plant Efficiency & Heat Dissipation Calculations

AI Thread Summary
A power plant generating 400 MW of electric power operates at 40% efficiency, resulting in a heat dissipation rate of 600 MW. To ensure the river's temperature rise does not exceed 3°C, calculations for the required flow rate involve using the waste heat and specific heat capacity of water. The discussion confirms that the majority of wasted energy is indeed lost as heat, with some assumptions about energy loss being reasonable. The calculations presented appear to be correct, and the methodology is sound. Overall, the participant expresses satisfaction with the approach taken for the problem.
Martinii
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Power plant

Hi! Here i have a problem : A power plant generates 400 MW of electric power.It has an effieciency of 40%.
a) At what rate does it dissipate heat?
b)If the waste heat is carried away by a river, and the temperature rise of the river must not exceed 3°C, what flow rate is required in the river?


Here is what i have tried:

a)
Pel=400 MW
η=40%=0.4
Pth=Pel/η=1000 MW

b) Pwaste=W/t Q=W=m*c*ΔT m=ρ*V

Pwaste=(ρ*V*c*ΔT)/t V/t= Volume Flow = V°= Pwaste/(ρ*c*ΔT)

Pwaste= Pth-Pel=600 MW and then calculations

I am not quite sure whether this way is correct or not.I will be happy if someone can tell me his opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems right to me, although there is at least one assumpution which is implied:
1. All of the wasted energy is lost as heat.
Fairly reasonable, there's bound to be some light and sound etc. but the vast majority will definitely be heat.

I don't fully understand your notation for Pwaste, but it looks pretty good. I guess one assumes that the river isn't below 0 C, and you can look up the specific heat of water, so that's no biggy. Seems like you got it.
 
Yeah , i think i got it! Thanks anyway :)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top