Power series of a strange function

bonildo
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
1. Write ∫e^(-t^2)dt with 0<=t<=x , as power series around 0. For what values of x this series converge ?

attempt at a solution:

f' = e^(-x^2) => f'(0) = 1
f''= -2x*e^(-x^2) => f''(0)= 0
f'''= -2e^(−x2) +4*x^2*e^(−x^2) => f'''(0)=-2

I tried to find a general rule for the derivatives but with no sucess.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd have to take more derivatives to hope to find a pattern. I would try an alternative approach, however. Expand the integrand as a series and then integrate term by term.
 
bonildo said:
1. Write ∫e^(-t^2)dt with 0<=t<=x , as power series around 0. For what values of x this series converge ?

attempt at a solution:

f' = e^(-x^2) => f'(0) = 1
You're off to a bad start here. f(x) = e-x2, not f'(x).
Still, I would follow vela's advice on this.
bonildo said:
f''= -2x*e^(-x^2) => f''(0)= 0
f'''= -2e^(−x2) +4*x^2*e^(−x^2) => f'''(0)=-2

I tried to find a general rule for the derivatives but with no sucess.
 
Mark44 said:
You're off to a bad start here. f(x) = e-x2, not f'(x).
No, he is taking f to be the integral itself so f' is the integrand.

Still, I would follow vela's advice on this.
Agreed. bonildo, write the Taylor's series for e^x, replace x with -x^2, then integrate term by term.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top