Power series of a strange function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the power series representation of the integral ∫e^(-t^2)dt from 0 to x, and determining the convergence of this series. The subject area includes calculus and series expansions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss taking derivatives of the function to identify a pattern, while others suggest expanding the integrand as a series and integrating term by term. There are questions about the correct interpretation of the function and the approach to finding the series.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the Taylor series expansion and integrating term by term, but there is no consensus on the best method or the region of convergence.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the setup of the problem and the interpretation of the function involved. Participants are also questioning the requirements of the original problem, particularly regarding the expected output.

bonildo
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
1. Write ∫e^(-t^2)dt with 0<=t<=x , as power series around 0. For what values of x this series converge ?

attempt at a solution:

f' = e^(-x^2) => f'(0) = 1
f''= -2x*e^(-x^2) => f''(0)= 0
f'''= -2e^(−x2) +4*x^2*e^(−x^2) => f'''(0)=-2

I tried to find a general rule for the derivatives but with no sucess.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd have to take more derivatives to hope to find a pattern. I would try an alternative approach, however. Expand the integrand as a series and then integrate term by term.
 
bonildo said:
1. Write ∫e^(-t^2)dt with 0<=t<=x , as power series around 0. For what values of x this series converge ?

attempt at a solution:

f' = e^(-x^2) => f'(0) = 1
You're off to a bad start here. f(x) = e-x2, not f'(x).
Still, I would follow vela's advice on this.
bonildo said:
f''= -2x*e^(-x^2) => f''(0)= 0
f'''= -2e^(−x2) +4*x^2*e^(−x^2) => f'''(0)=-2

I tried to find a general rule for the derivatives but with no sucess.
 
Mark44 said:
You're off to a bad start here. f(x) = e-x2, not f'(x).
No, he is taking f to be the integral itself so f' is the integrand.

Still, I would follow vela's advice on this.
Agreed. bonildo, write the Taylor's series for e^x, replace x with -x^2, then integrate term by term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K