Power Series Solution to Hydrogen Wave Function Differential Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation for the theta portion of the hydrogen wave function using a power series solution. The user derived a recursion formula and is attempting to find solutions for l = 0, 1, 2, and 3. They express confusion about whether substituting l for n directly yields valid solutions and how to handle normalization, specifically regarding the Legendre polynomials. Clarifications indicate that for each l, the solution is a polynomial of degree l, and normalization is simplified by the condition P_L(1)=1, eliminating the need for integrals. The user is encouraged to consult a Math Physics book for further understanding of Legendre polynomials.
eku_girl83
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
I solved the differential equation for theta portion of the hydrogen wave function using a power series solution. I got a sub n+2 = a sub n ((n(n+1)-C)/(n+2)(n+1)). I then truncated the power series at n = l to get
C= l(l+1).

I know need to use the recursion formula I found to find the l = 0, 1, 2, and 3 solutions to the differential equation. Do I simply plug l in for n? If so, I get for l = 0, a2 = -Ca0/2. Is this the SOLUTION to the D.E. for
l = 0, or do I need to do something else?
Similarly, for l = 1, I get a3= a1 (2-C)/6.

Any help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Put in C=L(L+1) and do the arith.
The last step is to require P_L(1)=1, which is the normalization conditon for Legendre polynomials (the name of the theta solutions).
 
If I sub in C= L(L+1), then I get a2 = -l(l+1)a0/2. But this is the solution for l = 0...so if I let l = 0, then I get a2 =0. This is also true for a3, a4, a5, ... Is this ok?

Also...when I normalize...Do I do the integral of a2^2 from -1 to 1 = 1 (since x = cos theta) and solve for a0??

I'm just a bit confused...thanks!
 
eku_girl83 said:
If I sub in C= L(L+1), then I get a2 = -l(l+1)a0/2. But this is the solution for l = 0...so if I let l = 0, then I get a2 =0. This is also true for a3, a4, a5, ... Is this ok?
Yes. For any L, the solution is a poynomial of degree L.
For L=0, P_0=1. For L_1. P_1=1, etc.
 
eku_girl83 said:
Also...when I normalize...Do I do the integral of a2^2 from -1 to 1 = 1 (since x = cos theta) and solve for a0??
QUOTE]
The usual Legendre polynomials are normalized so that P_L(1)=1 for each value of L. No integral is involved. This is different (and easier) than the usual normalization of functions. For your problem, the normalization may not be necessary.
 
eku_girl83 said:
I'm just a bit confused...thanks!
It may be time to look in a Math Physics book under
Legendre Polynomials in the index.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top