Power supply input discharge voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on measuring the discharge voltage of a laptop AC charger under different conditions. When testing a single power supply, the discharge voltage drops to 100V at 117.8ms and fully discharges at 900ms. However, when multiple power supplies are connected in parallel, the discharge time increases significantly, dropping to 100V at 500ms and fully discharging at 3000ms. This discrepancy raises questions about the expected behavior of parallel circuits, as two electrical engineers assert that discharge times should remain constant. The input resistance of the measuring device may play a crucial role in these varying results.
StuartHopkin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I would appreciate any help, opinions or explanations on this as I am receiveing many different views currently.

I measure the discharge voltage of a single power supply (laptop ac charger) using a digital chart recorder. On a trial and error basis I achieve the data as close as possible to the mains cycle peak.

The results show that the live to neutral charge drops to 100v at 117.8mS and is fully discharged at 900mS

I then plug 16 identical power supplies into a single power strip and in turn into a single socket.

The results show that the live to neutral charge drops to 100v at 500mS and is fully discharged at 3000mS.

The problem is that I have a graph showing the above test results, but I have been told by two separate electrical engineers that when the power supplies are connected in parrallel to a single power supply, physics dictates that the discharge should be constant and the time to discharge should be identical.

If anyone can shed any light on the above, either for or against their argument I would be extremely grateful.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is the input resistance of your chart recorder? Perhaps it forms a significant part of the discharge path when only one power supply is connected, shortening the discharge time.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top