Precision Temperature Measurement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on achieving high-resolution temperature logging in laboratory settings, specifically for aqueous solutions under 100 degrees Celsius. The original poster, Fritz, expresses dissatisfaction with RTDs due to their typical resolution of 0.1 degrees Celsius, seeking a method with ten times better precision. Questions arise regarding the measurement method, whether contact or non-contact, and the impact of probe thermal properties on temperature readings. Recommendations for further reading include "Measurement Systems, Application and Design" by Ernest O. Doebelin and "Applied Measurement Engineering" by Charles P. Wright, which provide insights into precision temperature measurement techniques. The conversation emphasizes the importance of resolution and precision over calibrated accuracy in temperature measurement.
fsonnichsen
Messages
61
Reaction score
5
What is the most precise way to log temperature in the laboratory? I am concerned with resolution and precision here, not accuracy.
RTDs don't seem to cut it. Almost all that I have looked at and tried only have a resolution of around 0.1 deg C. I was hoping for 10X better than that-
Thanks
Fritz
 
Science news on Phys.org
What is the substance/object you are trying to measure? Is this a contact temperature measurement, or non-contact? If it is a contact measurement, how do you keep the thermal properties of the probe from altering the temperature of the subject?

What is the environment? How quickly can the temperature of the subject change?
 
I am trying to keep this somewhat open but usually I am measuring the temperature of aqueous solutions at under 100 deg.

Any method is OK but I assume contact methods would be more accurate.

The temperature changes rather slowly in a large volume of liquid-in most cases it is in a constant temperature bath.
Regarding the probe thermal properties is always problematic and I have even seen RTDs carry heat down their wiring. However if the probe circuit is itself reasonably temperature stabilized this can be minimized. Again I am mainly interested in changes (resolution, precision) and not calibrated accuracy.

Thanks for the good questions
Fritz
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
There is a good discussion of precision temperature measurement techniques in Measurement Systems, Application and Design, 4th Edition, by Ernest O. Doebelin. I see that Amazon has a 6th Edition of this book for the dirt cheap price of $28.00 (International Edition). It's a bargain at five times that price.

Another good book with information on temperature measurement is Applied Measurement Engineering, by Charles P. Wright.

Both of these books would be good additions to your library. Doebelin has more information relevant to your specific application, so get it first. Wright complements Doebelin, and should be in the library of anybody making precise measurements.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thank you for the book suggestions. I will certainly order Doebelin.
 

Similar threads

I Can adding a second peltier cooler help lower temperatures even further?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Is my textbook wrong about absolute uncertainties?
Replies
2
Views
1K
A Do moon phases affect weighing precision on the microgram range?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Ruler measurements and knowing how many decimal places to include
Replies
9
Views
2K
Incandescent Bulb - suitable approximation for voltage-current curve
Replies
2
Views
947
Temperature vs moisture content to sustain a fire in a given material?
Replies
5
Views
1K
Decoding Thermal Measurement Equations with KD2 Pro
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Infrared Detectors & The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
4
Replies
152
Views
10K
(Specific) Heat capacity of brass at milliKelvin temperatures
Replies
5
Views
3K
Question about world average temperatures 1880- early 20th century
Replies
30
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top