Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Aerospace Predator/Reaper, why they went with a V-tail design?

  1. May 25, 2010 #1
    I have some questions about these two aircraft.

    Does anyone know why they went with a V-tail design?

    My understanding is that the Reaper is a more advanced version of the Predator. Why is the tail of the Predator point downwards but not the tail of the Reaper? I have heard that the Predator's tail was upside down because of the coupling between yaw and roll that the V-tail creates. If an upside down V-Tail tries to yaw the aircraft to port then the aircraft will roll to port, but if the V-Tail is right side up and it yaws the aircraft to port then it will create a rolling moment to starboard. Was this an actual reason for this tail config, or are the rolling moments from the V-tail to small to worry about? And if so what was the reason? It seems like a downwards pointing V-tail could have ground clearance issues.

    The Reaper also has a vertical stabilizer in addition to the V-tail. Why is that?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 25, 2010 #2
    Re: Predator/Reaper

    The MQ-9 is much larger than the predator, and flies a bit faster. For the MQ-9, its a Y tail, not a V tail.

    It was an issue of ground clearance for the landing gear.

    Yep.

    For more weathercock stability.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook