Pressure vs Flow: Impact of Flow Control Valves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chessie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Using flow control valves in pneumatics or hydraulics does not inherently reduce pressure; instead, they regulate flow rates. When flow to a piston is significantly reduced, such as to a drip, the pressure remains constant, but the force output may be affected due to the slower movement of the piston. The pressure can build up to the system's maximum if the flow is restricted, but the force exerted by the piston will depend on the flow rate. A flow control valve typically creates a pressure drop as it restricts flow, indicating that without a pressure drop, there is no flow. Understanding the relationship between flow and pressure is crucial for effective system performance.
Chessie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In terms of pneumatics or hydraulics does using a flow control valves reduce pressure??

I would assume that reducing flow does not reduce pressure but what if the flow to the piston of a double acting cylinder was reduced to a drip...would you still achieve the same force?? because of the constant pressure would the drip continue to build until full pressure was reached??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, a flow control valve works by restricting the flow in a pipe and thus normally has an associated pressure drop while controlling. A control valve with no pressure drop has no flow through it.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top