Pretension wire with horizontal load

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on optimizing the tension of a steel wire used for cutting cheese to reduce breakage. The wire experiences horizontal loading, and its tension influences its lifespan, with a need for a balance between initial tension and the wire's ability to form an arc while cutting. Proper attachment to pulleys can help align the wire and prevent breakage at the ends, while a gentle spring can provide necessary initial tension. The wire should start slack to allow for an effective cutting arc without excessive strain. Ultimately, achieving the right tension and arc geometry is crucial for maximizing wire longevity and cutting efficiency.
jzcrouse
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
I have a wire used for cutting cheese that gets pushed horizontally into the wire repeatably. Naturally the wires break as the wear. Currently, we just tighten the wire until it seems good but I am unsure how much the pretension in the wire influences the rate the wire breaks. I was looking to find the optimal wire tension to cause less broken wires. We typically have 90 psi pushing the cheese with .2 in wire. Its a steel wire so youngs modulus is 29E6 psi
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jzcrouse said:
.2 in wire.
You meant 0.020"? How long? What sort of anchor geometry?
 
Welcome to PF, sorry about the delay in reply.
Where does the wire break? At the terminals or at the point that last cuts the cheese?

This problem is more complex than it first appears. That is because the cutting force is perpendicular to the wire, while the tension is along the wire. The wire is loaded across the width of the cheese so ideally, it will form a parabolic curve while cutting. The wire can be approximated by a circular arc as it cuts the cheese. If the additional length of wire to form the arc comes from stretch, then the wire will tend to break more often. To get a long life from the wire it must start slack and form a significant arc through the cheese while it is cutting.

To prevent breakage at the ends, the ends should attach to a small round pulley that can align with the wire direction as tension causes the arc to form. In order to begin the cut straight and level there needs to be some initial tension in the wire. A gentle spring at one end wire mount is sufficient to provide the initial tension. Once the cheese is in contact with the horizontal wire, the spring deforms as the wire is pulled out, until the wire end reaches a pre-set solid stop. The length of wire is then long enough to form a significant arc that can cut the cheese without breaking. At the end of the cut, the spring should return the wire quietly to the straight starting line.

If the wire arc is too long, then the wire may deviate from the horizontal while cutting. It is a compromise that will allow you to use the thinnest wire possible that will cut with minimum force and last a long time.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top