Primer3 Design Tool - Adjust Salt Concentration & Use in PCR

  • Thread starter Thread starter sobored
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design
AI Thread Summary
Using Primer3 with a default Mg++ concentration of 1.5 mM can lead to inaccuracies in Tm calculations, especially when the average concentration in PCR kits is 5 mM. Setting the "Salt concentration" to 60 mM can help correct Tm values, but it is crucial to understand that this does not mean using that concentration of MgCl2 in the reaction. The standard practice is to use 1.5 mM MgCl2, as higher concentrations can lead to non-specific binding and unwanted amplification. Redesigning primers for optimal length and GC content is recommended, alongside performing a MgCl2 titration to determine the best concentration for specific reactions. Avoiding EDTA in buffers is also essential, as it can chelate Mg2+ and affect PCR performance.
sobored
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
When I use Primer3 design tool and the default Primer3 uses [Mg++] = 1.5 mM, whereas the average concentration is 5 mM in PCR kits. This concentration has a huge effect on the Tm. There is a “Salt concentration” box. Testing primer set designs for accuracy has shown that making the “Salt concentration” value 60 mM can help correct the Tm's.

My question is; when I set the “Salt concentration” at 60 mM should I also have to use salt in my reaction and what kind of salt ? and can I use other values than 60 mM salt?

Anyone who has used this tool before?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
You should use 1.5 mM MgCl2 in your PCR, that is the standard condition. The 5 mM in the PCR kits is a stock solution: you dilute the MgCl2 in your PCR mixture.

60 mM MgCl2 in your PCR? :bugeye: I don't think that's going to work!

Redesign your primers so that they have an acceptable Tm: their length should be around 20 bp and the GC content about 50%. Make sure to avoid primer dimers.
 
Btw, you can go up to 5 mM with your MgCl2 concentration. What will happen though is that the basepairing interaction of the DNA will be very strong, causing aspecific binding of the primers and thus the amplification of aspecific products.

If you are interested in whether MgCl2 is a rate-limiting step in your PCR, you should do a MgCl2 titration of say: 1.5 mM, 2.0 mM, 2.5 mM, 3.0 mM, 3.5 mM.

Also make sure that there is no EDTA in your buffer, it chelates Mg2+.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top