Principal quantum number n, large ones for hydrogen

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the maximum principal quantum number n for hydrogen atoms at a specific density of 7.1 x 10^-10 g/cm^3. The user initially calculated n using the Bohr radius equation and interatomic spacing, but overlooked the mass of the hydrogen proton, which led to an incorrect result. After reevaluating the problem and including the proton's mass, the user found the correct answer without rounding. The professor's requirement for an exact integer value, rather than a rounded one, was also clarified. This highlights the importance of considering all relevant factors in quantum calculations.
Yroyathon
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
hi folks, had a problem I couldn't do, though I made a valiant effort. perhaps you can tell me where I went wrong.

Homework Statement


All integer values of the principal quantum number n, even very large ones, are allowed in atoms. In practice, it is very hard to excite orbits that correspond to large n values in an atom unless the atom is totally isolated. Estimate the largest value of n that would be possible if you could make a gas of atomic hydrogen of density ρ = 7.1 10-10 g/cm3. For practical purposes, we regard an interatomic spacing of at least three times the diameter of the large-n atom as total isolation.
n_max =

Homework Equations


r_n = a_0 * (n^2), Bohr radius equation
a_0 = 5.3*10^(-11) m

The Attempt at a Solution


so I considered each atom as being in a cube L wide. L is the interatomic spacing, so L=3d=6*r_n=6*a_0*n^2=6*5.3*10^(-11)*n^2. our task is to find the value of n here.

Since we're given a density, which equals Mass/Volume, I arbitrarily set Volume = 1 cm^3, to make things easier.
Given a collection of these cubes stacked together in a large cube, say x*L is the side length. that is, there are x of these little cubes that each have a side length L. So this collection of cubes has a Volume of 1 cm3, therefore the side length has to be 1cm. so x*L=1cm=1*10^(-2)m.
But we also know the density, given at 7.1*10^(-10) g/cm^3. Since we set V = 1, this means the mass = 7.1*10^(-10)g.
The mass of the collection of little cubes is x^3 * m_e, the mass of an electron. (is this correct?...I just realized the mass of hydrogen, its proton, I completely ignored...). So I set x^3 = (7.1*10^(-10)g)/m_e, and substitute m_e = 9.109 * 10^(-28) g

x^3 = (7.1*10^(-10)g)/(9.109*10^(-28)g) Solving for x, I get x=920300. this is the number of hydrogen atoms in our collection of little cubes.

now, back to x*L=1*10^(-2)m. Solving for L, I get L = 1/(x*100) m. But since we know what L is, we can substitute it. so 6*5.3*10^(-11)*n^2=1/(x*100) m. We figured out x using the other route, so plugging x in, we get.

6*5.3*10^(-11)*n^2 = 1/(920300*100) . now solving for n^2, I get

n^2=1/(6*5.3*10^(-11)*920300*100), and

n^2=34.1699, so that n=5.8455.

I rounded this answer down to 5, since the the principal quantum number n has to be an integer, but this answer 5 was wrong.

so. here are my thoughts. maybe i should just put 5.8455? or maybe I should rework the problem including the mass of hydrogen's proton? perhaps that is what led me to a wrong answer. i emailed the prof about integer vs. exact answer, and of course he never responded so... yeah.

i'd appreciate any thoughts here or suggestions.

Thanks much,
Yroyathon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
turns out that both my concerns were valid. once I included the mass of the proton along with the electron, that led to the right answer. also, the prof/computer wanted an exact answer, so no rounding.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top