Principle of Superposition in Circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the principle of superposition to find the current Ix in a circuit with given voltage and current values. Participants emphasize the importance of using Kirchhoff's laws and the current divider rule to analyze the circuit effectively. One user initially struggles with calculating Ix and misapplies the current divider rule, leading to incorrect results. After receiving guidance on setting up the equations correctly, they correct their mistake and successfully solve for Ix. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in circuit analysis.
zealeth
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume that V = 4.8V and I = 3.2mA. Find Ix in the figure using the principle of superposition.

Steif.ch03.p64.jpg


Homework Equations



V=IR
Kirchhoff's Current Law
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law
Total response = ∑responses from each individual source

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe I'm having trouble in simply solving for I_x in each circuit, but if you see any other mistakes please let me know.

Replacing the voltage source with a short circuit, we have:

x8zXRc4.png


Not really sure how to go about solving this one. If I had to guess, I would right a KCL at the bottom node such that:

I + the current across the 2k and 1k Ohm resistors = I_x

Replacing the current source with an open circuit, we have:

62FLHTV.png


Summing the resistances now in series and solving for i_total:

4k * i_total = 4.8

i_total = .0012 A

If I'm not mistaken, this should be equal to I_x_2.

I_x = I_x_1 + I_x_2 = ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the current divider rule? It is helpful in solving the first circuit.

Rather than just looking up current divider, try to prove it using the result
 
Let me help by proving the current divider rule for your circuit, then you can proceed to finish your superposition.

The way your circuit is set up (the first one), you have a current source feeding current into two branches right. OK, those branches are in parallel. The voltage across them is equal so we can write the equations:

1K(I1) = 3K(I2)

You can realize that I2 is just I total minus I1. You know I total and the resistances so from here you have Ix1

Does this make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I am familiar with the current divider rule and attempted to use it earlier (forgot to mention in post) , but it gave me the wrong answer so I did not think that was how to solve it. The mistake I made was using 0.0032 as a positive number, which gave me the incorrect result. Looking at your post proving the current divider, I was able to correct my mistake and solve the problem. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Happy to hear that.

You're welcome
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top