Probability of a state containing n particles (Maxwell-Boltzmann)

akoe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For a system of particles at room temperature (use kT = 0.026 eV), the energy of a single particle state is 0.01 eV greater than its chemical potential, so that ε-μ = 0.01 eV. Computer the average occupancy of this single particle state, as well as the probability of the state containing 0, 1, or 2 particles, assuming the particles obey Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.

Homework Equations


Ztot=\frac{1}{N!}Z1N

The Attempt at a Solution



I've already solved the first part of the problem - the part about the average occupancy, but I'm having trouble calculating the probability of a state containing n particles. I am pretty sure that it should be P(n)=\frac{1}{Z}e^{-nε/kT}, because if we view the single particle states as the energies allowed, then if the single particle state has n particles in it, the energy of the state (total) is nε. But, I'm not really sure which Z to use here... is it Zint, Ztot, or Z1? Also, I don't know ε, just ε-μ, so I think that my expression needs to involve those variables...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the give a chemical potential, you are working in the grand-canonical ensemble, i.e., your distribution function is
f(\vec{p})=\frac{1}{(2 \pi \hbar)^3}\exp \left [-\beta \left (\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m}-\mu \right ) \right] \quad \text{with} \quad \beta=\frac{1}{T}.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top