Probability of a student failing a prelim but passing the course

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of a student failing a prelim while still passing the course. It is established that 38% of course passers fail the prelim, but confusion arises regarding the interpretation of conditional probabilities. Participants clarify that the probability of failing the prelim given passing the course is not the same as the probability of failing the prelim and passing the course. A method using Bayes' Theorem is suggested to accurately determine these probabilities, emphasizing the importance of understanding conditional probabilities in this context. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the learning gained from the problem-solving process.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-11-18_20-57-0.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-11-18_21-12-32.png
[/B]
upload_2017-11-18_21-12-32.png


The % of course passing students who fail the prelim test is 38%. So, the required probability is 38 %.
Isn't the probability of a student failing the prelim when he his passing the course is known already = probability of a student who failed the prelim but pass the course?

Another idea is to calculate total no. of students who failed the prelim let's say, N(pre F).
Then the required probability is ##\frac {\text{no. of students who have passed the course but failed the prelim i.e. N(course P, prelim F)} }{\text{ non. of students who failed the prelim i.e.N( pre F)}##

Let's take the total no. of students to be 100.N( pre F) = 100 *95%*4% +100 * 5% * 75%= 7.55
N(course P, pre F) = 100 *95%*4%=3.8
Thus, the req. probability = 3.8/7.55=0.503

I have solved the question, but I don't understand what I had done here.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-18_20-57-0.png
    upload_2017-11-18_20-57-0.png
    22.3 KB · Views: 1,253
  • upload_2017-11-18_21-12-32.png
    upload_2017-11-18_21-12-32.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 1,112
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 215217

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 215218 [/B]
View attachment 215218

The % of course passing students who fail the prelim test is 38%. So, the required probability is 38 %.
Isn't the probability of a student failing the prelim when he his passing the course is known already = probability of a student who failed the prelim but pass the course?

Another idea is to calculate total no. of students who failed the prelim let's say, N(pre F).
Then the required probability is ##\frac {\text{no. of students who have passed the course but failed the prelim i.e. N(course P, prelim F)} }{\text{ non. of students who failed the prelim i.e.N( pre F)}##

Let's take the total no. of students to be 100.N( pre F) = 100 *95%*4% +100 * 5% * 75%= 7.55
N(course P, pre F) = 100 *95%*4%=3.8
Thus, the req. probability = 3.8/7.55=0.503

I have solved the question, but I don't understand what I had done here.

(1) This question does not belong in the Introductory Physics Forum; it belongs in Precalclulus Mathematics.
(2) How can you claim to have solved the problem when you do not know or understand what you did? That makes no sense!
(3) The way to deal with such problems is through the use of conditional probabilities: ##P(A|B)## = probability of ##A##, given that ##B## occurs. You are told that among the students who pass the course, 96% of them passed the prelim; that is you are told that P(pass prelim|pass course) = 0.96. You are also told that among the students who fail the course, 25% passed the prelim; that is, P(pass prelim|fail course) = 0.25. Finally, you are also told that P(pass course) = 0.95. From those givens you are asked to find P(pass course|fail prelim). That is a standard exercise in Bayes' Theorem.

One way to deal with such problem if you don't know Bayes' theorem, is to do a tabular method like the one you attempted. However, you need to break down cases differently: we can have (pass course, pass prelim), (pass course, fail prelim), (fail course, pass prelim) and (fail course, fail prelim).

Suppose we take ##N = 1000## students. Among these, ##N_p = (0.95)(1000) = 950## pass the course and ##N_f = 1000-950 = 50## fail the course. So far, we have obtained the following partial table:
$$\begin{array}{r|cc|r}
& \text{pass prelim}&\text{fail prelim} & \text{Total} \\ \hline
\text{pass course} & ? &? & 950 \\
\text{fail course} &? & ?& 50\\ \hline
\text{Total} & ? & ? & 1000
\end{array}
$$
Let us fill in the missing entries in the first row. We are told that among the 950 who passed the course, 96% of them passed the prelim, so the figure in cell (pass course, pass prelim) is (0.96)(950) = 912, and the number in cell (pass course fail prelim) = (0.04)(950) = 38. So, now our table looks like this:
$$\begin{array}{r|cc|r}
& \text{pass prelim}&\text{fail prelim} & \text{Total} \\ \hline
\text{pass course} & 912 &38 & 950 \\
\text{fail course} &? & ?& 50\\ \hline
\text{Total} & ? & ? & 1000
\end{array}
$$

By similar considerations you can fill in the rest of the table.

Now when you are asked for P(pass course|fail prelim) you are being asked asked for a ratio in the "fail prelim" column. All that is taken care of quickly and easily by Bayes' Theorem, but you can do the problem without it---it just takes a bit more work.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Pushoam said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 215217

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 215218 [/B]
View attachment 215218

The % of course passing students who fail the prelim test is 38%. So, the required probability is 38 %.
Isn't the probability of a student failing the prelim when he his passing the course is known already = probability of a student who failed the prelim but pass the course?
No. If I am interpreting your phrasing correctly, they are not the same. To use more standard phrasing: The probability of a student failing the prelim given he passed the course ≠ probability of a student failing the prelim and passing the course. The first phrase looks at probabilities only within the group that has failed the prelim. The second phrase looks at probabilities within the entire space of students.
Another idea is to calculate total no. of students who failed the prelim let's say, N(pre F).
Then the required probability is ##\frac {\text{no. of students who have passed the course but failed the prelim i.e. N(course P, prelim F)} }{\text{ non. of students who failed the prelim i.e.N( pre F)}##

Let's take the total no. of students to be 100.N( pre F) = 100 *95%*4% +100 * 5% * 75%= 7.55
N(course P, pre F) = 100 *95%*4%=3.8
Thus, the req. probability = 3.8/7.55=0.503

I have solved the question, but I don't understand what I had done here.
This is a fairly standard application of Bayes' Rule.
 
Bayes' Rule is important to know. It tells you how to adjust probabilities when you get some additional information. It solves a lot of problems methodically where your intuition can be very misleading.
 
Thank you.
I learned the problem.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top