Probability of finding a system an eigenstate

krobben92
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



As the homework problem is written exactly:
Consider the quantum mechanical system with only two stationary states |1> and |2> and energies E0 and 3E0, respectively. At t=0, the system is in the ground state and a constant perturbation <1|V|2>=<2|V|1>=E0 is switched on. Calculate the probability of finding the system in the state |2>.

Homework Equations


H=V (I'm just assuming these states must be such that there is no kinetic energy and E=V, but that's just my guess - professor lacks communication skills at times).

|c1|2 + |c2|2 = 1
P(|2>)=|c2|2 (thus, I need c2 to solve the problem!)

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I'm completely confused as to why he gave us <1|V|2>=<2|V|1>=E0, what that even means, and where I'm supposed to retrieve the probability coefficients which is all I need to solve the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
krobben92 said:

Homework Statement



As the homework problem is written exactly:
Consider the quantum mechanical system with only two stationary states |1> and |2> and energies E0 and 3E0, respectively. At t=0, the system is in the ground state and a constant perturbation <1|V|2>=<2|V|1>=E0 is switched on. Calculate the probability of finding the system in the state |2>.

Homework Equations


H=V (I'm just assuming these states must be such that there is no kinetic energy and E=V, but that's just my guess - professor lacks communication skills at times).

|c1|2 + |c2|2 = 1
P(|2>)=|c2|2 (thus, I need c2 to solve the problem!)

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I'm completely confused as to why he gave us <1|V|2>=<2|V|1>=E0, what that even means, and where I'm supposed to retrieve the probability coefficients which is all I need to solve the problem.
Hi there!

Have you learned non degenerate perturbation theory? This is the formalism required to do this problem. What formula have you seen for perturbation theory?
 
No, at least not that I know of. I'm familiar with chapters 1-4 in Griffiths, if that helps.
 
Also you are given the complete information about the unperturbed Hamiltonian!
 
vanhees71 said:
Also you are given the complete information about the unperturbed Hamiltonian!

Right, I get that I have all of the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian, but I'm not sure how that's going to help me determine that probability of finding the system in state |2>. Also, we've never covered non degenerate perturbation theory, so is there another more elementary way to solve this problem?
 
krobben92 said:

Homework Statement



As the homework problem is written exactly:
Consider the quantum mechanical system with only two stationary states |1> and |2> and energies E0 and 3E0, respectively. At t=0, the system is in the ground state and a constant perturbation <1|V|2>=<2|V|1>=E0 is switched on. Calculate the probability of finding the system in the state |2>.

Homework Equations


H=V (I'm just assuming these states must be such that there is no kinetic energy and E=V, but that's just my guess - professor lacks communication skills at times).
No, this isn't right. You add V to the existing Hamiltonian, so H=H0+V. What are the matrix representations of H0, V, and H? You should be able to figure out the rest from there.

|c1|2 + |c2|2 = 1
P(|2>)=|c2|2 (thus, I need c2 to solve the problem!)

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I'm completely confused as to why he gave us <1|V|2>=<2|V|1>=E0, what that even means, and where I'm supposed to retrieve the probability coefficients which is all I need to solve the problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top