Probability of finding particle in 1D finite potential well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of finding a particle in a 1D finite potential well using the wave function ψ(x). Participants clarify that the probability expression involves integrating the square of the wave function over the specified range, but emphasize the importance of normalization. There is confusion regarding the normalization process, with suggestions to refer to examples from textbooks and online resources. The conversation highlights the distinction between normalized and unnormalized wave functions and the need for clear definitions in the equations presented. Ultimately, the participants arrive at a better understanding of the normalization process and its application to the problem at hand.
Ryomega
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ψx is the function of postion for a particle inside a 1D finite square well. Write down the expression for finding the particle a≤x≤b. Do not assume that ψx is normalised.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is to check I'm not going insane:

P = ∫ lψxl2 dx = 1

Is that about right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you're saying you will always find the particle between x=a and x=b? That's what a probability of 1 means.
 
Err... not sure why I typed in the "= 1" bit since I don't know what the probability is.
But you understood that the probability of finding the particle between a and b is expressed through my equation. So I rest my case.
 
Well, I wouldn't say I understood that's what you meant. I guessed that is what you probably meant. For all I know, you could have been writing down the normalization condition. What you wrote is too vague to be meaningful, and it isn't correct. Can you flesh it out a bit?
 
P = ∫ lψxl2 dx (integral from a to b)

This is the formal expression for probability of finding a particle within a boundary.

For normalisation, we say that the particle must be somewhere since we take the integral from -∞ to ∞.

1 = ∫ lψxl2 dx (integral -∞ to ∞)

Two totally separate equations.
 
Both of those equations hold only if the wave function is normalized. If the wave function isn't normalized, what would be the expression for the probability?
 
...the awkward moment when I don't know the answer has arrived.
Please illiterate.
 
Consider finding the average value of a function over its domain.

ave[f(x)] = ⌠f(x)dx / ⌠dx

Food for thought.
 
If you are given that the object is in an infinite square well, then of course there is a probabilty of 1 that it is in the square well. I would have expected the problem to ask for the probability distribution of its position in that well. You can get that by solving Shrodinger's equation.

Oh, dear! I just reread the title and realized it says finite well, not infinite"!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
So I'm getting... do a double integral or solve the schödinger equation or do a barrel roll.
Care to go a tiny bit further for me please?
 
  • #11
How do you normalize a wave function?
 
  • #12
square and integrate it. So... double integration and power of 4?
 
  • #13
That's given that the particle is between a and b and that isn't specified
 
  • #14
Ryomega said:
square and integrate it. So... double integration and power of 4?
I don't know what you're trying to say. Show your work so that your meaning is clear.
 
  • #15
∫∫ llψxl2l2 dx dx (inner from a to b, outer from -∞ to ∞)

seems strange...but that's what I'm imagining at the minute
 
  • #16
Let's say you have the unnormalized wave function ##\psi(x)##, and let ##\phi(x)## be its normalized counterpart. How are ##\psi## and ##\phi## related?
 
  • #17
-∞ to ∞ ∫ lψ(x)l2 dx = ϕ(x)
 
  • #18
The lefthand side of your equation is a definite integral, so the result is a number, not a function of x. Try again. Surely your textbook has an example.
 
  • #19
This is why I'm here, I've looked through 3 books and numerous sites and I can't seem to find this particular example where the wave function is NOT normalised.
 
  • #21
I've been reading this a while now and I finally understand what you were trying to teach me. Page two of the document shows that the normalisation process, of the wave equation. I see now, where I've been going wrong.

Thank you so much!
 
Back
Top