Probability that a measurement of Sx will yield hbar for this state

sabre729
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Alright, so there is a problem in the Townsend quantum mechanics book that reads: What is the probability that a measurement of Sx will yield the value hbar for this state:


The state is given by:
|ψ> = 1/sqrt(14) * (1,2,3i)
(But the vector is represented as a column vector in state ψ)

It's in the Sz basis, and it is a spin 1 particle.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



In another problem I determined the eigenstates of Sx for a spin 1 particle in terms of the eigenstates for |1,1>, |1,0>, |1,-1>. So I figured it would be easy to take that vector for hbar and just do the probability amplitude on it with the given ψ. That vector I have is:

(1, sqrt(2), 1)

Again as a column vector. Or row vector, either way really. But when I did that I got a value bigger than 1. So I'm obviously missing something here, and I was hoping someone could tell me what.

Also I have a huge issue when bases switch, and yes, it's just a lin alg thing and I should review it, but as I do, does anyone have a quick trick for these kinds of problems? It's really appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Check the normalization of the Lx eigenstate you used.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top