Problem about uncertainty principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the uncertainties Δx and Δp for an electron pulse with a width of 1 nanosecond and kinetic energy of 1 keV. Initially, there is confusion about whether knowing the kinetic energy implies zero uncertainty in momentum, leading to an infinite uncertainty in position, which contradicts the uncertainty principle. It is clarified that both momentum and energy have small uncertainties that must be accounted for. The position uncertainty is linked to the pulse width of 1 ns, which helps in determining the velocity. Ultimately, the participant resolves their misunderstanding regarding the significance of the 1 ns duration in the context of the uncertainty principle.
Andurien
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
We have an electron pulse of width 1 nanosecond and with kinetic energy of 1keV. We have to calculate Δx and Δp.

I have a question regarding this problem. If they give us the kinetic energy of the electron pulse then we know exactly the momentum right? And so the uncertainty of momentum would be 0 and therefore Δx=∞ for the uncertainty principle ΔxΔp≥h. However I feel this reasoning is incorrect otherwise the problem would be trivial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The momentum, together with the energy, have some small uncertainty (<<1 keV). You can calculate the minimal uncertainty of this, based on the position uncertainty.
 
And how do I calculate the position uncertainty? Both Δx and Δ p are unkown.
 
Δx is known. It is hidden in the "length" of 1ns, and you can calculate the velocity.
 
Thank you I finally solved I didn't understand the meaning of that 1ns.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top